Strange to hear, I'm sure, but I love geomorphs. Out of curiosity, however, if making square geomorphs with 2 entrances per side, why not go with the model being used by the majority of the bloggers - being a 100' x 100' (or 10 squares by 10 squares) geomorph? That would make it interchangeable with all the geomorphs I've made and the many hundreds made in the same style by other bloggers since then (and thus could also be imported into Dave's Mapper?)
Funny, I didn't even notice the scale difference at first. But yes, working with the existing standard would be a good thing... unless you've got a good supply of geomorphs already made at this scale.
Yeah, I post mine gridless (thus that became the standard), but the base design is as you did for your new ones - 10 x 10 with the entrances at 3 and 7.
Strange to hear, I'm sure, but I love geomorphs. Out of curiosity, however, if making square geomorphs with 2 entrances per side, why not go with the model being used by the majority of the bloggers - being a 100' x 100' (or 10 squares by 10 squares) geomorph? That would make it interchangeable with all the geomorphs I've made and the many hundreds made in the same style by other bloggers since then (and thus could also be imported into Dave's Mapper?)
ReplyDeleteFunny, I didn't even notice the scale difference at first. But yes, working with the existing standard would be a good thing... unless you've got a good supply of geomorphs already made at this scale.
ReplyDeletehmmm, looking at a lot of those geomorphs out there many of them don't even have a grid. I'll have to consider it.
ReplyDeleteYeah, I post mine gridless (thus that became the standard), but the base design is as you did for your new ones - 10 x 10 with the entrances at 3 and 7.
ReplyDelete